From Switched
Monday, June 22, 2009
Maria Sharapova Models Cell Phone-Enabled 'Light Up' Dress
From Switched
Compare with the Bumblebee in California.....
From http://www.dailystab.com/california-man-creates-life-size-bumblebee-transformer-in-front-yard/
From Mobile
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Monday, June 15, 2009
Funny Design
From Found Shit
Subways in the US
New York, New York
New York, in our humble opinion, has the only truly functional mass transit system in the country. This graphic, which compares the maps of every subway system in America, shows why. Most subway systems, as you can see, are built like spokes radiating out from a central hub. This makes it easy to travel to the center of the city. But the center of the city is an outmoded destination. And, the people in the vast pie wedges formed between the spokes are virtually transportation-less. New York, on the other hand has subways that cross each other, making many more areas accessible. Though, to be fair, it’s hard to compare New York to any other American city.
It's my first time see the whole subway system of the US in one map. I noticed the difference of New York City, it's system are like a web, everywhere are connected and reachable. The value of the subway in NY maybe not just where it located, it's a system bring people everywhere without driving a car. That's impossible for the rest of US.
from Good
Textbook rant
Textbook rant
I've spent the last few months looking at marketing textbooks. I'm assuming that they are fairly representative of textbooks in general, and since this is a topic I'm interested in, it seemed like a good area to focus on.
As far as I can tell, assigning a textbook to your college class is academic malpractice.
They are expensive. $50 is the low end, $200 is more typical. A textbook author in Toronto made enough money from his calculus textbook to afford a $20 million house. This is absurd on its face. There's no serious insight or leap in pedagogy involved in writing a standard textbook. That's what makes it standard. It's hard, but it shouldn't make you a millionaire.
They don't make change. Textbooks have very little narrative. They don't take you from a place of ignorance to a place of insight. Instead, even the best marketing textbooks surround you with a fairly non-connected series of vocabulary words, oversimplified problems and random examples.
They're out of date and don't match the course. The 2009-2010 edition of the MKTG textbook, which is the hippest I could find, has no entries in the index for Google, Twitter, or even Permission Marketing.
They don't sell the topic. Textbooks today are a lot more colorful and breezy than they used to be, but they are far from engaging or inspirational. No one puts down a textbook and says, "yes, this is what I want to do!"
They are incredibly impractical. Not just in terms of the lessons taught, but in terms of being a reference book for years down the road.
In a world of wikipedia, where every definition is a click away, it's foolish to give me definitions to memorize. Where is the context? When I want to teach someone marketing (and I do, all the time) I never present the information in the way a textbook does. I've never seen a single blog post that says, "wait until I explain what I learned from a textbook!"
The solution seems simple to me. Professors should be spending their time devising pages or chapterettes or even entire chapters on topics that matter to them, then publishing them for free online. (it's part of their job, remember?) When you have a class to teach, assemble 100 of the best pieces, put them in a pdf or on a kindle or a website (or even in a looseleaf notebook) and there, you're done. You just saved your intro marketing class about $15,000. Every semester. Any professor of intro marketing who is assigning a basic old-school textbook is guilty of theft or laziness.
This industry deserves to die. It has extracted too much time and too much money and wasted too much potential. We can do better. A lot better.
From Seth's Blog
It's great to see the education combine with technology in the future, bring practical and efficient learning environment. But another issue is the copyright, how to make life more convenient but not offending the intellectual property?
Monday, June 8, 2009
High Line
Museum day
Enjoy free general admission for you and a guest to hundreds of museums and cultural venues nationwide. Saturday, September 26, 2009
How?Present the Museum Day admission card to receive free general admission at participating Museum Day locations. The admission card is available in the September 2009 issue of Smithsonian magazine or downloadable via this site.
Low Product
The Failed Promise of Innovation in the U.S.
New York Design Week 2009
Monday, June 1, 2009
Mike Sheldrake's Cardboard Surfboard
from Core77
Swap Websites for Graphic Designer
from GD90+
Change is better than improve
From SethGodin's Blog
The next Google
Microsoft, home of the Zune, has just announced that they're going to launch Bing, a rebranding and reformatting of their search engine. So far, they've earmarked $100 million just for the marketing.
Bing, of course, stands for But It's Not Google.The problem, as far as I can tell, is that it is trying to be the next Google. And the challenge for Microsoft is that there already is a next Google. It's called Google.
Google is not seen as broken by many people, and a hundred million dollars trying to persuade us that it is, is money poorly spent. In times of change, the rule is this:
Don't try to be the 'next'. Instead, try to be the other, the changer, the new.
If Microsoft adds a few features and they prove popular, how long precisely will it take Google to mirror or even leapfrog those features?
With $100 million, you could build (or even buy) something remarkable. Something that spread online without benefit of a lot of yelling and shouting. Something that changes the game in a fundamental way. The internet works best when you build a network, not when you buy a brand. In fact, I can't think of one successful online brand that was built with cash.
Stupid strategy! I think people would like to seek for new thing instead of collect different versions of the copy.
There are so many social networking sites right now, they all have slightly different function or connection, attract different group of people or both. Maybe "Bing" could looking for another new service, break a new path.